{rfName}
Th

Indexed in

License and use

Altmetrics

Grant support

Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES, Brazil), Grant/ Award Number: 88887.310560/2018-00; National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq, Brazil), Grant/Award Number: 405965/2016-8

Analysis of institutional authors

Dantas, AAuthorQuinteros, GjAuthor

Share

Publications
>
Article

The combined use of progressive and block freeze concentration in lactose-free milk: Effect of process parameters and influence on the content of carbohydrates and proteins

Publicated to:Journal Of Food Process Engineering. 44 (11): e13867- - 2021-11-01 44(11), DOI: 10.1111/jfpe.13867

Authors: Dantas, Adriana; Quinteros, Gisela J; Darvishvand, Shadi Yaribeigi; Blanco, Monica; Hernandez, Eduard; Prudencio, Elane Schwinden; Samsuri, Shafirah

Affiliations

Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Technol Ctr, Postgrad Program Food Engn, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil - Author
Univ Politecn Cataluna, BarcelonaTech, Dept Agrifood Engn & Biotechnol, C Esteve Terradas 8, Barcelona 08860, Spain - Author
Univ Politecn Cataluna, BarcelonaTech, Dept Math, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Univ Teknol PETRONAS, Chem Engn Dept, Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia - Author

Abstract

This work focuses on the study of the concentration of lactose-free milk using a combination of progressive freezing concentration (PFC) with block freezing concentration (BFC). First, we investigated the PFC of skim lactose-free milk applying response surface methodology. To analyze the influence of three factors (stirring rate, coolant temperature, and assay time) on the response variables (concentrate yield, efficiency of the process, concentration index, and average ice growth rate), a central composite design was used previously. It was found that all factors had a significate influence on the responses. Then, once the optimized condition for this step was chosen (time of 58 min, coolant temperature of -5 degrees C, and mechanical stirring of 1,035 rpm), the ice obtained from it was subjected to a new freeze concentration cycle using the BFC assisted by vacuum. In the concentrated fraction of this cycle, protein and carbohydrate contents were equals to 6.7 g 100 g(-1) and 10.24 g 100 g(-1), respectively. The results suggest that in PFC carbohydrates accumulate more in the concentrated phase, while in BFC it is the protein that has the greatest tendency to pass into the concentrated liquid. In this approach, we believe that it is possible to combine the two techniques (PFC + vacuum-assisted BFC) to obtain concentrates, and that they can be used for the development of innovative lactose-free dairy products. Practical Applications The use of concentration processes can facilitate the customization of milk products rich in proteins to meet specific requirements on nutritional and functional properties, for instance in bakery products, formulated food, ice-cream, beverages, energy drinks, and others. Moreover, since most changes occur in an aqueous environment, the removal of some part of milk water results in its preservation. Within the concentration processes, the freeze concentration emerges swiftly thanks to its inherent features, involving low-temperature processing and selective nature of the water removal step. Because of the low temperatures used in freeze concentration, this technology is gaining in popularity as an alternative technique to the standard concentration techniques currently used in dairy processing. It offers the most enhanced functional and sensorial qualities of concentrated milk because it decreases the quality deviation by minimizing the heat abuse on sensitive milk components, such as proteins, water-soluble vitamins, and aromatics.

Keywords

Coffee extractCryoconcentrationFood industryIceSolute recoverySystemTechnologyWater

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Journal Of Food Process Engineering due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2021, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q2 (Segundo Cuartil), in the category Chemical Engineering (Miscellaneous). Notably, the journal is positioned en el Cuartil Q3 for the agency WoS (JCR) in the category Engineering, Chemical.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 2.28, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions Jun 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-06-19, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 11
  • Scopus: 13
  • OpenCitations: 10

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-06-19:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 31 (PlumX).

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: Brazil; Malaysia.

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (DANTAS, ADRIANA) .