{rfName}

Indexed in

License and use

Citations

Altmetrics

Grant support

Special thanks are due to Zoonomi S.A. and BioMar Hellenic S.A. for the provision of feedstuffs and Philosofish S.A. for the provision of fish.

Analysis of institutional authors

Gisbert, EnricAuthor

Share

June 3, 2025
Publications
>
Article
No

The Effects of Dietary Fishmeal Substitution by Full-Fat and Defatted Zophobas morio Larvae Meals on Juvenile Gilthead Seabream (Sparus aurata): An Integrative Approach

Publicated to:Aquaculture Nutrition. 2025 (1): 8885509- - 2025-05-25 2025(1), DOI: 10.1155/anu/8885509

Authors: Asimaki, Adamantia; Psofakis, Pier; Gkalogianni, Elli-Zafeiria; Katouni, Aikaterini-Maria; Berillis, Panagiotis; Kormas, Konstantinos A; Rumbos, Christos I; Athanassiou, Christos G; Vasilaki, Antigoni; Fountoulaki, Eleni; Henry, Morgane; Mente, Eleni; Gisbert, Enric; Karapanagiotidis, Ioannis T

Affiliations

Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Sch Vet Med, Lab Ichthyol Culture & Pathol Aquat Anim, Thessaloniki, Greece - Author
Hellen Ctr Marine Res, Inst Marine Biol Biotechnol & Aquaculture, Anavyssos, Greece - Author
Inst Agrifood Res & Technol IRTA, Aquaculture Program, La apita, Spain - Author
Univ Patras, Dept Agr, Mesolongion, Greece - Author
Univ Thessaly, Fac Agr Sci, Dept Agr Crop Prod & Rural Environm, Lab Entomol & Agr Zool, Volos, Greece - Author
Univ Thessaly, Fac Agr Sci, Dept Ichthyol & Aquat Environm, Aquaculture Lab, Volos, Greece - Author
See more

Abstract

This study evaluated the dietary fishmeal substitution by full-fat (FF) and defatted (DF) Zophobas morio meals regarding growth, feed efficiency, proximate and fatty acid compositions, digestive enzymes activities, histology and midgut microbiota in gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata). Juveniles initially weighing 3.4 g were distributed to triplicate groups and fed at satiation six isonitrogenous (8.41%) and isocaloric (21 Mj/kg) diets for 100 days. An insect meal-free diet was the control (CTRL), two diets contained a FF Z. morio meal at 49 g/kg (FF-49) and 97 g/kg (FF-97), and three diets contained a DF Z. morio meal at 58 g/kg (DF-58), 116 g/kg (DF-116) and 174 g/kg (DF-174) at the expense of fishmeal. Neither the form nor the inclusion level of Z. morio meals affected the feed intake of fish denoting a similar acceptability to that of fishmeal. Fish survival, growth and feed efficiency were not impaired by all dietary inclusion levels of Z. morio meals. Proximate composition of fish was altered but without indicating a clear correlation with the form or inclusion level of Z. morio. Increasing inclusions of both forms of Z. morio meals tended to decrease 22:6n-3, 20:5n-3, 18:3n-3 and 18:2n-6 levels in fish tissues. All fish exhibited similar proteolytic enzyme activities, but the increasing inclusions of both insect meal forms led to gradual increases in the lipase and alpha-amylase activities indicating a compensatory mechanism for lipid and carbohydrate digestion. The use of Z. morio meals led to some mild histomorphological changes in the intestine and liver that were more pronounced in fish fed the FF form at the highest inclusion level. Midgut bacterial communities of the groups were similar and dominated by potentially beneficial members of Saccharimonadales and Rhodobacteraceae, except FF-97 fish that had high abundances of Legionella- and Pandoraea-like bacteria. To conclude, Z. morio meal, either FF or DF, is a suitable insect protein for fishmeal substitution towards more sustainable aquafeeds for S. aurata.

Keywords

Black soldier flyConversionDigestive enzymesFatty acidFeedFooGrowth-performanceHermetia-illucensHistologyInsect mealIntestinal microbiotaLife-cycle assessmentNutrient digestibilityProximate compositionSustainable aquafeedTenebrio-molitor

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Aquaculture Nutrition due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2025, it was in position 12/62, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Fisheries.

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-04:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 1.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 1 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 0.5.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 1 (Altmetric).

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: Greece.