{rfName}

License and Use

Licencia Icono OpenAccess

Citations

2

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Peñalver-Cruz, AinaraAuthor

Share

October 6, 2025
Publications
>
Article

Insect biological control: a global perspective

Publicated to: Entomologia Generalis. 45 (4): 879-904 - 2025-10-20 45(4), DOI: 10.1127/entomologia/3237

Authors:

Gontijo, Lessando M; Torres, Jorge B; Abram, Paul K; Alfaro-Tapia, Armando; Arredondo-Bernal, Hugo C; Biondi, Antonio; Cloyd, Raymond A; Costamagna, Alejandro C; Desneux, Nicolas; D'Ottavio, Marie; Furlong, Michael J; Greco, Nancy M; Labbe, Roselyne; Hill, Martin; Lavandero, Blas; Li, Tian-Hao; Lomeli-Flores, Jose R; Lucas, Eric; Messelink, Gerben J; Rocca, Margarita; Rodriguez-Garcia, Marcela; Parra, Jose R P; Penalver-Cruz, Ainara; Sokame, Bonoukpoe Mawuko; Thackeray, Sean; Urbaneja, Alberto; Vargas, German; Zalucki, Myron P; Zang, Lian-Sheng
[+]

Affiliations

- Author
Agr & Agri Food Canada, Agassiz Res & Dev Ctr, Biol Control Insect Pests, 6947 Highway 7,POB 1000, Agassiz, BC V0M 1A2, Canada - Author
Biobest Mexico, Josefa Ortiz de Dominguez 24, Zapopan 45235, Jalisco, Mexico - Author
CEPAVE CONICET UNLP Asociado CICBA, Blvd 120 E-60 & 64, RA-1900 La Plata, Argentina - Author
Colegio Postgrad, Carretera Mexico Texcoco Km 36-5, Texcoco 56230, Estado De Mexic, Mexico - Author
Guizhou Univ, Key Lab Green Pesticide & Agr Bioengn, Minist Educ, Guiyang 550025, Peoples R China - Author
Guizhou Univ, State Key Lab Green Pesticides, Minist Educ, Guiyang 550025, Peoples R China - Author
Int Ctr Insect Physiol & Ecol Icipe, POB 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya - Author
IRTA, Sustainable Plant Protect, Agronoms, Lleida 25198, Catalonia, Spain - Author
Kansas State Univ, Dept Entomol, 123 Waters Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA - Author
Pontificia Univ Catolica Valparaiso, Ctr Reg Invest & Innovac Sostenibilidad Agr & Ter, Ctr Ceres, Quillota 2260000, Chile - Author
Protecció Vegetal Sostenible . Producció Vegetal - Author
Rhodes Univ, Ctr Biol Control, POB 94, ZA-6140 Makhanda, South Africa - Author
Unite Dept Sci Biol, Lab Lutte Biol, Montreal, PQ, Canada - Author
Univ Catania, Dept Agr Food & Environm, Catania, Italy - Author
Univ Concepcion, Fac Ciencias Nat & Oceanog, Dept Zool, Lab Entomol Aplicada, Casilla 160-C, Concepcion, Chile - Author
Univ Cote Azur, INRAE, UMR ISA, F-06000 Nice, France - Author
Univ Fed Rural Pernambuco, Dept Agron Entomol, BR-52171900 Recife, Brazil - Author
Univ Florida, Inst Food & Agr Sci, Trop Res & Educ Ctr, 18905 SW 280 St, Homestead, FL 33031 USA - Author
Univ Manitoba, Dept Entomol, Ft Garry Campus, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada - Author
Univ Quebec Montreal UQAM, Dept Sci Biol, Lab Lutte Biol, Montreal, PQ, Canada - Author
Univ Queensland, Sch Environm, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia - Author
Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Entomol & Acarol, Escola Super Agr Luiz de Queiroz, Ave Padua Dias 11, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil - Author
Univ Talca, Lab Control Biol, Inst Ciencias Biol, Norte 685, Talca, Chile - Author
Valencian Inst Agr Res, Plant Protect & Biotechnol Ctr, Valencia, Spain - Author
Wageningen UR Greenhouse Hort, Bleiswijk, Netherlands - Author
See more

Abstract

The intentional use of biological control agents to manage arthropod pests dates back to as early as 304 AD, when Chinese farmers used weaver ants to manage citrus pests. Over time, biological control has evolved into distinct approaches: classical, augmentation, and conservation. Prior to the advent of pesticides, most insect pest management relied on natural and classical biological control. The most common strategy used at first, despite regional variations, was the importation of biological control agents. Nonetheless, due to issues with unintentional non-target impacts, numerous failures in the introduction, and longer periods required for implementation, augmentative and conservation approaches have become more frequently practiced. Additionally, growing demands from the government and the public for more sustainable farming, along with investments from private companies, have sped up the progress and use of augmentative biological control around the world. This extensive use of insect biological control agents and the ongoing development of new insights underscore the need for a thorough and up-to-date global review. We combine expertise from several world regions to address the unique historical, developmental, and regional challenges associated with augmentative insect biological control. From region to region, we observed differences in pest-natural enemy systems, places of implementation (greenhouse vs. field), type and level of investment (public vs. private), history of implementation, awareness of ecologically based strategies, and other factors. There are also many similarities, especially regarding the upcoming challenges in addressing the rising demand from the agricultural sector and climate change. These include producing and assessing the quality of biological control agents, establishing more biological control enterprises, improving the logistics of natural enemy transportation, making more use of native biological control agents in augmentative biological control, optimizing the utilization of mass-reared and resident biological control agents, increasing the application of ecologically based strategies at local and landscape levels, and promoting interdisciplinary collaborations. Taken together, the article offers an examination of the distinctive aspects of augmentative biological control programs and their associated challenges around the world.
[+]

Keywords

Augmentative releasesBug hemiptera anthocoridaeCassava mealybugControl agentsDiamondback mothEcological intensificationEntomopathogensGreenhouseIntegrated pest management (ipm)Integrated pest-managementLepidoptera-noctuidaeMass rearingNative natural enemiesNatural enemiesParasitoidsPesticidesPredatorsRegulatory frameworksSustainable crop protection

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Entomologia Generalis due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2025, it was in position 4/110, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Entomology. Notably, the journal is positioned above the 90th percentile.

Independientemente del impacto esperado determinado por el canal de difusión, es importante destacar el impacto real observado de la propia aportación.

Según las diferentes agencias de indexación, el número de citas acumuladas por esta publicación hasta la fecha 2026-04-13:

  • WoS: 1
[+]

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2026-04-13:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 13.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 12 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

    It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

    • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
    • Assignment of a Handle/URN as an identifier within the deposit in the Institutional Repository: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12327/4863
    [+]

    Leadership analysis of institutional authors

    This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: Argentina; Australia; Brazil; Canada; Chile; China; France; Italy; Kenya; Mexico; Netherlands; South African Republic; United States of America.

    [+]

    Observations

    EC/HE/101060430/EU/EU-China joint action to increase development and adoption of IPM tools/ADOPT-IPM; EC/HE/101136611/EU/“NextGenBioPest” - Next Generation Biopesticides for the control of the most “difficult-to-manage” pests and pathogens in fruits and vegetables/NextGenBioPest
    [+]

    Awards linked to the item

    We wish to thank Dr. Adeney Bueno for the invitation to contribute this review to the journal and the 'Programa de Apoios FEALQ' for providing financial support. The co-author Armando Alfaro-Tapia was funded by the ANID postdoctoral grant (FONDECYT) No. 3230599. N. Desneux was supported by the Horizon Europe projects ADOPT-IPM (no. 101060430) and NextGenBioPest (no. 101136611) .
    [+]